同学们,本栏目是对你们学过的知识和生活中常见问题的归纳。其中,有一些共性问题,也许你会需要哦!
让我来帮你解决常见问题!
Answer:
In literal comprehension, readers use their language knowledge to identify and understand the information explicitly stated in the text, while in inferred comprehension, it requires the combination of readers’ language competence, background knowledge and inference skills. Evaluative comprehension allows readers to analyse and evaluate a passage with the help of their own knowledge and values.
Answer:
The interactive-compensatory approach is most efficient for integrated competence. This approach not only includes background information and prediction from the context, but also the student’s ability to decode words and phrases. It also focuses on both the visual and non-visual information in the reading process. Visual information is gained directly from the printed page, while non-visual information comes from the reader's entire knowledge system. These can practise students’ holistic reading ability.
Answer:
I often adopt the process-oriented approach. With this approach, students analyse the topic and collect relevant information and materials. While students start drafting, the teacher will observe students’ problems and provide help. After the drafting, the teacher will correct students’ drafts. The advantages are obvious in that it promotes students’ autonomous learning and it’s student-centered. The disadvantages may be that it is too difficult for some students since they are mostly required to complete the writing task on their own.
Answer:
The three-stage approach fits my present teaching the most because it is organized and systematic. In the pre-writing stage, students gets a clear idea of what they are going to write and gets fully prepared for the writing, as a result of which, the writing process will not be such a challenge. In the post-writing stage, suggestions and feedback are given by the teacher for further improvement.